...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2007, 12:49 AM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Camaro X Oil Reservoir

Can anyone tell me what Mark Stielow used in his Camaro x for the Dry sump reservoir? It looks like he used an aftermarket one and I was wondering why he didn't use the GM one!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2007, 01:11 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I liked to know this too. And what kind of oilpan it has? Does the stock LS7 work with stock steering gear? And is there any heat issues with ATS headers ?? https://lateral-g.net/stielow/16.jpg it looks the plug boot is quite close?
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2007, 07:15 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It's a Peterson 8 quart tank and a Peterson remote breather mounted alongside. The pan is from ATS.

EDIT, the headers aren't that close. That's just an optical illusion from the angle that I took that picture at. Here's another pic of the ATS headers:

__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro

Last edited by XcYZ; 01-23-2007 at 07:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-23-2007, 10:31 AM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Scott!!! Do you have any photos of the sump setup? Why did he have to change the pan? Was it not compatible with the sump setup? Was there a performance gain in his going with the Peterson can and breather?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:32 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yes thanks Scott for update. I think the sump was because of stock steering system. I wonder why Mark didnt use front R&P kit like BRP has?? And yes if you can Steve,let us know why not stock gm dry sump tank and brather??
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:38 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm sure Mark had several reasons for not using the stock tank, but one thing he specifically mentioned was packaging. I don't recall off hand how tall the stock tank is.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-23-2007, 01:02 PM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I see....so it was more of a packaging issue rather than performance!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-23-2007, 02:48 PM
Stielow's Avatar
Stielow Stielow is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,524
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2,302 Times in 621 Posts
Default

I used a Peterson 2 gallon dry sump tank. It was alot cheaper the the OE peice and was set up with -12 AN fittings and fit my car better. ATS made the pan to fit a stock front sub frame. I just sent the whole feature on the engine install to Hot Rod so it will be out soon.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-23-2007, 06:02 PM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow
I used a Peterson 2 gallon dry sump tank. It was alot cheaper the the OE peice and was set up with -12 AN fittings and fit my car better. ATS made the pan to fit a stock front sub frame. I just sent the whole feature on the engine install to Hot Rod so it will be out soon.

Mark
Mark,

Thanks so much for the direct input. I will check into it and if the Peterson unit is cheaper than why not. I assume the performance is the same for both or is one better than the other packaging aside?

John
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:58 PM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default LS7 Dry Sump Reservoir Tank Dimensions

I've been searching on here and all over the web and have not been able to find information on the size and dimension specs of the Dry Sump Reservoir tank for the LS7 engine. Can someone provide these for me? If the OEM is not suitable because of size constraints I will go with a setup like Marks!

Thanks!!

John

Last edited by novanutcase; 01-23-2007 at 09:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net