...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-2006, 06:32 PM
GBodyGMachine's Avatar
GBodyGMachine GBodyGMachine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Farmington,MI
Posts: 325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Anyone Running 6.0L Truck Blocks?

I was just wondering how popular the Iron 6.0l's are. I am seriously thinking about running one. I can get them for a pretty good price. I have heard they make good numbers.

Jeff
__________________
84 Regal Project GBodyGMachine
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2006, 07:22 AM
427ls1 427ls1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

The weight of the cast iron block is 210.4 lbs, the alluminum block is 92.5 lbs. Means someting to some people. I'm currently in my build of a cast iron LQ-9 6.0 2002 truck block stroking it to a 427. I've done 383's and stock ls1's, ls2's and ls6's, but i think for the beating I'll deliver on this engine i'll stick to cast iron. The 6.0 LQ-4 casting 317 alluminum heads are as good as any ls1, ls2 and ls6. THe Chamber size is a little bigger, but works with most stroker combinations. These engines tend to have the piston come up above the deck with an aftermarket rotating assembly so make sure u check your gasket thickness before slapping her together. Stock gaskets are .050 thick! I just had a customer bring me a set of patriot heads to bolt on to his 383 stroked ls6. I'd stay away from those heads, just alot of money for throwing a cnc machine on it.

Here are some specs on stock heads taken from jrp at ls1tech.com, this guys taken the time to post this so we dont have to research it all. He's got port flows and everything else listed here too. Thanks JRP!


just look for posting: JRP's FAQ For Commonly Asked Questions



Casting Number 241
Head: 1997+ LS1 5.7 Litre Passenger Car
Material: Aluminimum
Part Number:
12559806 (1997-98) Chambers = 69cc
12559853 (1999-00)
12564241 (2001-03)
Combustion Chamber Volume: 66.67cc
Compression Ratio: 10.1:1
Intake Port Volume: 200cc
Exhaust Port Volume: 70cc
Intake Valve Diameter: 2.00 inches
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 1.55 inches


Casting Number 243
Head: 2001 LS6 5.7 Litre Passenger Car
Material: Aluminimum
Part Number:
12564243
Combustion Chamber Volume: 64.45cc
Compression Ratio: 10.5:1
Intake Port Volume: 210cc
Exhaust Port Volume: 75cc
Intake Valve Diameter: 2.00 inches
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 1.55 inches

Casting Number 706
Head: 1999+ LR4 4.8 Litre Truck
1999+ LM4 /LM7 5.3 Litre Truck
Material: Aluminimum
Part Number:
12559852
12561706
Combustion Chamber Volume: 61.15cc
Compression Ratio: 9.5:1
Intake Port Volume: 200cc
Exhaust Port Volume: 70cc
Intake Valve Diameter: 1.89 inches
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 1.55 inches

Casting Number 373
Head: 1999-2000 LQ4 6.0 Litre Truck
Material: Cast Iron
Part Number:
12561873
Combustion Chamber Volume: 71.06cc
Compression Ratio: 9.5:1
Intake Port Volume: 210cc
Exhaust Port Volume: 75cc
Intake Valve Diameter: 2.00 inches
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 1.55 inches

Casting Number 317
Head: 2001+ LQ4 6.0 Litre Truck
Material: Aluminimum
Part Number:
12572035
Combustion Chamber Volume: 71.06cc
Compression Ratio: 10:1
Intake Port Volume: 210cc
Exhaust Port Volume: 75cc
Intake Valve Diameter: 2.00 inches
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 1.55 inches



It takes about .005" milling of the block deck to remove 1cc of volume. It takes .007" milling to remove 1cc from an LS1 head
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2006, 05:07 PM
GBodyGMachine's Avatar
GBodyGMachine GBodyGMachine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Farmington,MI
Posts: 325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks a bunch. What crank are you going to use to get 427"'s?

Jeff
__________________
84 Regal Project GBodyGMachine
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2006, 06:00 PM
nitrorocket's Avatar
nitrorocket nitrorocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 488
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If you get a killer deal, go for it, But if it is more then $1200-1500, just go for an LS1. The accessories, intake, and oil pan are usually not real desirable for a car swap. Plus the weight savings is huge! As far a strength, don't worry about it, the aluminum block is bullet proof! You will not and CANNOT break an ls1 aluminum block naturally aspirated!
__________________
Twin Turbo LS1 '71 Chevelle
1000 hp 93 octane street car
6 speed
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2006, 06:11 PM
GBodyGMachine's Avatar
GBodyGMachine GBodyGMachine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Farmington,MI
Posts: 325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

But I am going to be running a 76mm turbo

Jeff
__________________
84 Regal Project GBodyGMachine
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2006, 06:30 PM
nitrorocket's Avatar
nitrorocket nitrorocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 488
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Don't worry, I run twin 61 mm turbos. There is a guy who ran twin 66 mm turbos with 30 psi, made about 1500 hp on the stock aluminum block. I am at about 1000 with no problems.
__________________
Twin Turbo LS1 '71 Chevelle
1000 hp 93 octane street car
6 speed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2006, 10:11 PM
00fxd's Avatar
00fxd 00fxd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrorocket
If you get a killer deal, go for it, But if it is more then $1200-1500, just go for an LS1. The accessories, intake, and oil pan are usually not real desirable for a car swap. Plus the weight savings is huge! As far a strength, don't worry about it, the aluminum block is bullet proof! You will not and CANNOT break an ls1 aluminum block naturally aspirated!
Why isn't the oil pan desirable for a car swap? I'm just starting to do the reasearch. The LQ9 engine might be just the thing for my mid year Corvette!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2006, 04:41 AM
InMotionJosh InMotionJosh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 00fxd
Why isn't the oil pan desirable for a car swap? I'm just starting to do the reasearch. The LQ9 engine might be just the thing for my mid year Corvette!
I believe the oil pan for the 6.0 hangs down a bit lower than the vette or fbody pans, also the placement can be a problem in some cars with the crossmembers. 6.0 is a great option and it will accept the fbody, vette, or aftermarket pans just like the ls1.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:31 AM
00fxd's Avatar
00fxd 00fxd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Dub.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-25-2006, 09:04 AM
TT402LS1 TT402LS1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SW Wisconsin
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Im going to be running a 6.0L block. I got my engine for $1000.00 w/ 26K on it. I sold some parts off it I didnt need, so I got about $800.00 into it. Well.......... a little more than that now I guess

__________________
71 Chevelle w/ LQ4 stroked to 402ci, Twin 62mm turbos, Viper T56 M6, 12 Bolt with 3.42's.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net