...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2006, 12:42 AM
tyoneal's Avatar
tyoneal tyoneal is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Easiest Big Power, LS1, LS2, or LS6?

To all:

After reading this forum for quite a while, I have grown to seriously considering putting a LSx Engine into my Camaro. (Despite my old, possibly outdated Bias towards the BBC and the SBC)

Here is my question:

Which Engine, the LS1, LS2 or LS6, would be the easiest platform to build a 750 hp - 850 hp (Probably Turbo Charged) Pump Gas '69 Camaro?

Any and all ideas are Welcome. Has any company that you know of built, or is building these types of Engines?

Thanks again,

tyoneal
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2006, 12:51 AM
ArisESQ ArisESQ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Gatos
Posts: 765
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

i could be wrong, but i was under the impression that the LS motors were all based on the same platform, with the exception of some different valvtrain and various different intake manifolds... if thats actually the case, id imagine that an LS1 would be the best bet since they are most common and cheapest, and since you would probably be replacing the intake as well as the cam...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2006, 03:08 AM
tyoneal's Avatar
tyoneal tyoneal is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You are probably correct, it would make since that the topend might be what differenciates them.

I'm pretty sure the LS7 is a different beast.

.... but what do I know, that's why I ask.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2006, 06:40 AM
nitrorocket's Avatar
nitrorocket nitrorocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 488
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

There is not one single thing on the LS motors that is similar to a regular SBC, besides haveing 8 cylinders. They have a block that rivals the tall deck Dart block with raised cam, wider rails, tall deck(9.24") etc. The LS1 will blow away any SBC in every dingle cataegory from power, reliability, weight, you name it.
Any motor will make the power you want in a built up stage (i.e. Forged pistons and rods.) The LS7 is the only motor that would make a reliable 800 hp with turbos in completely stock form. All others will need rods and pistons. A typical standard with some porting, new rods and pistons, and good valves can easily make 900-1000 hp on 93 octane with a good turbo setup. Ls1 will be much cheaper then a LS7, they are also much more available. If you are going turbo, just buy an LS1 for $2,500 and change the rods and pistons, you will easily make 800 hp on a mild tune while getting 20+ mpg!
__________________
Twin Turbo LS1 '71 Chevelle
1000 hp 93 octane street car
6 speed
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2006, 08:10 AM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,046
Thanks: 19
Thanked 62 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Can't go wrong with an Ls motor, go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2006, 10:00 AM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I know the whole world thinks the LSx engine the way to go but,a sbc will still make the horsepower.stock to stock the Lsx is alittle better but when you modify them,the power isnt not much differnet if any.

But with you wanting a Ls the ls7 is the best factory block,next would be a Ls6 which is more available than the Ls7.about a 1/3 the camaro production in 02 used Ls6 blocks.Both engines have to have crank,rods,pistons for that kind of power level.

Last edited by rocketman; 09-11-2006 at 10:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-11-2006, 10:48 AM
J2SpeedandCustom J2SpeedandCustom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 855
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've seen the stock LS6 with some valve springs take guys into the 700's fwhp range. With some mods you'd easily be able to obtain your goal and keep the $$$ down.
__________________
Jeff Allen
J2 Speed and Custom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-11-2006, 10:51 AM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketman
I know the whole world thinks the LSx engine the way to go but,a sbc will still make the horsepower.stock to stock the Lsx is alittle better but when you modify them,the power isnt not much differnet if any.

But with you wanting a Ls the ls7 is the best factory block,next would be a Ls6 which is more available than the Ls7.about a 1/3 the camaro production in 02 used Ls6 blocks.Both engines have to have crank,rods,pistons for that kind of power level.
I don't have any particular personal knowledge, but my impression is that the head/valve train design on the LSx engines is much better than the 23 degree stuff for the Gen 1 SBC's and that for a given displacement and level of tune, the LSx's will virtually always kick the Gen 1 SBC's rear. Would that it weren't so, since I have a lot of Gen 1 stuff ready to go for a 434 build, but oh well . . .
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-11-2006, 10:59 AM
nitrorocket's Avatar
nitrorocket nitrorocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 488
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

A stock ls1 head flows about 280 cfm @.600 lift, not .700 like most sbc heads are rated. A factory ls1 head with a port job will flow 330 cfm int/ 270 cfm exhaust @.600 lift!!! That is insane!! That is with a factory head!

Nobody top date has broken a stock LS1 crank from to much power, I am over 1000 hp and 800 ftlb on a stock crank, aluminum ls1 block, and heads! I made the switch from a tall deck 427" SBC and am still excited about the new motor!!
__________________
Twin Turbo LS1 '71 Chevelle
1000 hp 93 octane street car
6 speed
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-11-2006, 11:41 AM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,046
Thanks: 19
Thanked 62 Times in 38 Posts
Default

LS motor to me is easy power, easy driveability, and good mileage. Those are big in my book.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net