...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2006, 08:53 PM
cam69 cam69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default horse power rating on stock LT1

does anybody know the HP of an LT1, and max HP it can handle stock before hurting something.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2006, 09:24 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

N/A or forced industion? I used to run a 8# blower on my 94 LT1 making 415 rwhp and never blew it up, but I'd say that was alot for the stock bottom end. Weakest link were the stock pistons which would blow up with too much boost or N20, also opti's were a weak point. The 95+ had a vented unit which was supposed to be a better design.

93-95 F-body LT1's were 275 hp
96-97 F-body LT1's were 285 hp
96-97 Ram Air/SS LT1's were 305 hp
92-96 Vette LT1's were 300 hp
96 LT4's were 330 hp

lots of info on: www.camaroz28.com
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-21-2006, 10:08 PM
cam69 cam69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar
N/A or forced industion? I used to run a 8# blower on my 94 LT1 making 415 rwhp and never blew it up, but I'd say that was alot for the stock bottom end. Weakest link were the stock pistons which would blow up with too much boost or N20, also opti's were a weak point. The 95+ had a vented unit which was supposed to be a better design.

93-95 F-body LT1's were 275 hp
96-97 F-body LT1's were 285 hp
96-97 Ram Air/SS LT1's were 305 hp
92-96 Vette LT1's were 300 hp
96 LT4's were 330 hp

lots of info on: www.camaroz28.com
asking becuse i have a new LT1 that was given to me today,and was wondering if it was worth the effert to install in my 69 convertible with a turbo setup.im not planing on drag racing or dogging the car.i just want to cruse it and the setup to look nice under the hood.thanks on the info ,would like to know your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2006, 04:51 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I woudn't twin turbo the stock LT1 bottom end, it won't last very long, unless it's running low boost (6 psi) You can get good power from it NA if you install a good set of heads, cam and run a coil per cyl. setup like the LS1. Plus you'll need a good tune.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2006, 03:03 PM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You don't need the coil per cylinder stuff,The new MSD opti solved all the opti problems,A stock LT1 bottemend is good to about 450/ 475 hp.There good engines,I have stroked Lt1 in my 94 Z and it makes good power.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2006, 05:47 AM
Chevy350 Chevy350 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oslo in Norway/North Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Also visit www.impalassforum.com, they have lots of good info on getting the LT1's reliable in big, heavy cars.
__________________
Thanks, Christian (@v8power.net)
'77 Chevy Caprice
'71 Chevy Nomad
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2006, 09:06 PM
Beast2831's Avatar
Beast2831 Beast2831 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conroe TEXAS
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Lt4

I think the LT1 can handle close to 500 hp. I know the crank and piston rods are rated for 500 hp. You can buy an LT4 kit that comes with cam, head, and intake for about$2500. It is said to put out about 425 hp. Thought about going that way myself, but I also have a 383 that is ready to go with about the same hp.
__________________
Troye
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2006, 10:19 PM
fatlife's Avatar
fatlife fatlife is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

putting a twin turbo LT1 probably wouldn't be worth the 10-12K+ price tag if you just want to cruise and look good, a stock LT1 would take care of that just fine, good little motor
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-2006, 12:50 AM
DRCE DRCE is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Having built a couple hundred LT1/LS1 engines I can give you some advice here. The LT1 packages today that we are producing make roughly 430rwhp in 383ci N/A form. To put a blower or nitrous on it to hit 600rwhp is pretty easy, but I think defeats the purpose of the project and not worth the investment into an engine that was given to you. At least as far as I understand things. IF you wanted a turbo/blower you could just build a forged 355 short block and leave top half stock with some upgraded valve train goodies and you'd easily make 500rwhp.

The stock components are weak and are a crap shoot plain and simple when you get over 350rwhp. They weren't designed for that level of abuse, and have been known to give way almost without warning. I compare it to 10 bolt rear ends, some folks have them last a few years with 500rwhp then some cat snaps his with 300rwhp.

A good looking 355 or 383 with a nice cam and such on it would work out well. It would make some good power, have a nice idle note to it, and not set you back too much cabbage. Just my .02

Heres an image of an LT1 done up that looks pretty sharp in the engine bay. Them canton valve covers are nice lookin.

http://victoryracingengines.com/gall...Gibbs/000_0463

Last edited by DRCE; 09-07-2006 at 12:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-07-2006, 05:45 PM
D Rock D Rock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Sure why not. LT1s are fuel injected and with twins you can have 400 rwhp on 6psi. After all you said you aren't really looking to race the car or dog it, so as long as the motor has a good safe tune then it should last at low boost.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net