|

02-20-2014, 10:19 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
FI : more gains with cams or with heads?
I've searched to no avail. even on ls1tech...
Most searches come up with head AND cam not heads OR cam.
I have a lq9 and my friend is giving my his Procharger d1sc for free! I just have to have it rebuilt.
My question is, will I see more gain more from just a FI cam and ls6 mani or with ported l92 heads and l76 manifold at 8-9 psi?
I understand the cost difference is significant.
If the cam route is better, I'll port the stock heads.
Thanks.
|

02-20-2014, 05:39 PM
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,545
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 815 Times in 617 Posts
|
|
Too many variables to say honestly. However, I would go with the cam change. You're forcing air into the engine while under boost versus trying to suck it in running N/A. Changing how long the valves stay open to compliment the supercharger would be a better route in my mind. That and your stock heads are good to begin with. Porting them later is a solid and easy option that will only compliment the cam more.
__________________
Trey
Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.
Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
|

02-21-2014, 11:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix
Too many variables to say honestly. However, I would go with the cam change. You're forcing air into the engine while under boost versus trying to suck it in running N/A. Changing how long the valves stay open to compliment the supercharger would be a better route in my mind. That and your stock heads are good to begin with. Porting them later is a solid and easy option that will only compliment the cam more.
|
I don't see the variables...you're basically increasing the airflow either through the heads and intake (since If I go L92, I have to go L76 mani) or through a cam through the stock Lq9 heads.
I guess one variable would be the spec of the cam. Let's say an aggressive FI cam that's streetable. It won't ever see the track as it will be a weekend cruiser.
Thanks
|

02-21-2014, 12:32 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Metamora, IL
Posts: 353
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
What are your horsepower goals? You can make a lot of power with a boosted motor with stock cam and heads.
__________________
Rod
1969 Camaro - LS2/4L70E
|

02-21-2014, 02:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketrod
What are your horsepower goals? You can make a lot of power with a boosted motor with stock cam and heads.
|
I'd like to hit 550rwhp on 91 octane and will never see the track so I'll be on street tires.
|

02-21-2014, 03:01 PM
|
Lateral-g Supporting Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,545
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 815 Times in 617 Posts
|
|
That's an easy goal to hit. I'd go cam change with supporting mods like intercooler, headers, and full exhaust and then call it done. The cam will help give it good sound which I think is important to the overall goal/attitude of a good street cruiser. It will also help you target where you want the power to an extent as well.
For reference, a stock C5 Z06 with nothing more than headers and high flow cats into the stock Ti exhaust made 540 rwhp with Pro-Charger's Stage 2 system. The Stage 2 system utilized larger intercoolers, better air intake, and slightly higher psi than a "normal" C5 kit. Given the packaging restraints on a car like the C5, I see no reason you couldn't get good intercoolers and a clean free flowing air intake into the head unit itself on a classic car with an open engine bay. Your 317 heads are basically lower compression LS6 heads.
__________________
Trey
Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.
Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
|

02-21-2014, 03:46 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Metamora, IL
Posts: 353
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6carmello8
I'd like to hit 550rwhp on 91 octane and will never see the track so I'll be on street tires.
|
I talked with ECS about supercharging my ls2. They said 550 rwhp was very doable on a completely stock motor. If you have the cash I do a cam.
__________________
Rod
1969 Camaro - LS2/4L70E
|

02-21-2014, 04:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix
That's an easy goal to hit. I'd go cam change with supporting mods like intercooler, headers, and full exhaust and then call it done. The cam will help give it good sound which I think is important to the overall goal/attitude of a good street cruiser. It will also help you target where you want the power to an extent as well.
For reference, a stock C5 Z06 with nothing more than headers and high flow cats into the stock Ti exhaust made 540 rwhp with Pro-Charger's Stage 2 system. The Stage 2 system utilized larger intercoolers, better air intake, and slightly higher psi than a "normal" C5 kit. Given the packaging restraints on a car like the C5, I see no reason you couldn't get good intercoolers and a clean free flowing air intake into the head unit itself on a classic car with an open engine bay. Your 317 heads are basically lower compression LS6 heads.
|
Thanks for this. As you can see I have PLENTY of room in the engine bay and in front of the radiator as well. My friend who is giving me the SC-1 also has a 4 core intercooler by Procharger but he was running 14 PSI...I probably can get away with a smaller unit since I'm limited to about 10 PSI with 91 and my compression ratio, not to mention unnecessary pressure loss. I've been around FI for a while but somewhat new to LSX's so I'm still learning the nuances of these engines  I think I'm also forgetting how large (though we get used to it) these engines are so FI on them is just nuts. Took me 13 psi from a Gt35R on a 3.2 to achieve 420rwhp on my old car...6psi on an ls2 is 600 to the engine
|

02-21-2014, 04:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketrod
I talked with ECS about supercharging my ls2. They said 550 rwhp was very doable on a completely stock motor. If you have the cash I do a cam.
|
Looks like I may not even need a cam after all. I'm going to get the SC1 running then decide if I want to do a cam but thanks for the info guys. Looks like cam over ported heads.
|

02-28-2014, 11:55 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 668
Thanks: 4
Thanked 62 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Do a cam/dual springs/pushrods and rebuild the rocker arms with the Comp Cams trunion kit.
Brian Tooley Racing can custom spec you a cam and provide all these parts.
Get your throttlebody ported as well. Great bang for the buck.
If you have e85 in your area or can do a meth injection kit... get it tuned that way. 91 octane pump gas is garbage and can vary on octane levels for boost.
__________________
Project: 1969 Chevelle, alum 5.3, GTS76 turbo, Chiseled Perf A/W intercooler, Holley Dominator EFI, Davis TC, JRi coilovers, 14" brakes, T56 Magnum. CTS-V Recaro seats!
Coffey Fabrication Nashville, TN doing the fabwork! 800rwhp+/25mpg+/9's@150mph goal
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=52976
1993 Mazda FD RX-7, built LS7, T56 Magnum, Holley HP, Davis Tech TC, 8.8" 3.73 Cobra IRS diff, DSS axles, Ohlins coilovers, big brakes.
CCW 18x11 front 315/30/18's and 18x12.5 rear on 335/30/18 RA1's, 2850lbs
10.31@137mph 165mph Shift-Sector 1/2 mile speed
441ci AllPro headed motor and 200lb weigh reduction in the works....
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:18 PM.
|