...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2006, 11:45 AM
tumper93 tumper93 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Hotchkis to qa1 coil over conversion--which springs

I recently installed the hotchkis front coil springs on my 68 Camaro and found a great deal on some tubular upper and lower control arms. Since I will be replacing the control arms and need some quality shocks I have decided to sell the hotchkis springs and switch to the qa1 coil overs so I can adjust ride height and get a good shock all at one time. My question is should I run the small block springs or step up to the big block springs due to their higher spring rates. The car is a small block,aluminum head,intake and w/p with power steering. Anybody have any suggestions on which to use or ones they a have used.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2006, 07:03 PM
JV69z/28 JV69z/28 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 94
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lightbulb

This month's feature car has The QA1 coilovers. Some people have said the big block springs higher spring rate also come with a higher ride height. I have also heard that Global West has 500lb springs available but I don't see them on their web site. Try doing a search also you may find what you need.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2006, 11:12 PM
71Nova 71Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yea global west does have shorter 500lb springs. They are not on thier web site and I am not even sure if they are in their catalog but I do know they have them. I bought some last week and love them. Someone said the qa1 springs work well with an LS1 in the nose since they are around 200lb lighter. The global west springs let you have a firmer performance feel and a low ride height. I didnt know they had them eather and I stop in from time to time because I live close to them. I was not satisfied with the qa1 springs so I was very happy when they told me they made them.
David
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-18-2006, 11:34 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

The BB springs made my car with the LS1 sit too high. So I went with SB springs. I'd say go for the SB springs if you are running a SB.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net