...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > LSX Conversions
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2012, 07:20 PM
out2kayak out2kayak is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leo, IN
Posts: 440
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Default LT1 or LSX?

So, given:

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/24/m...mall-block-v8/

http://www.chevyhardcore.com/news/br...-block-reveal/

http://wot.motortrend.com/next-gen-l...-6f-bpDeLwI9wS

http://www.corvetteonline.com/news/v...g-twin-turbos/

Is the new LT1 going to impact your LSX plans?

__________________
-- Joe
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2012, 08:42 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Bird in the hand (LSx) vs. bird in the bush (Gen 5 LT1).

I suspect you're looking at a 2 year plus delay as the engines get into wrecking yards (or the GMPP catalog) and the after market suppliers figure out what's need to make them work in our cars.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2012, 09:21 PM
randy randy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,041
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 43 Posts
Default

why your at it lets talk about the future release of the lt2, lt7, and lt9. lol


im still going to stick a ls2 into my car. WHY??? because im tired of waiting and i want something thats economical and available now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2012, 08:11 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,699
Thanks: 459
Thanked 711 Times in 432 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
Bird in the hand (LSx) vs. bird in the bush (Gen 5 LT1).

I suspect you're looking at a 2 year plus delay as the engines get into wrecking yards (or the GMPP catalog) and the after market suppliers figure out what's need to make them work in our cars.
Very good point!

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy View Post
why your at it lets talk about the future release of the lt2, lt7, and lt9. lol
Funny, but probably true.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2012, 09:53 PM
srh3trinity srh3trinity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 596
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The harsh reality for me is I will probably never use my car to its full potential. The LS3 I am building is overkill, the suspension and brakes are overkill, etc. When my driving skills/needs eclipse the car, I will upgrade. I learned this lesson from wake boarding. New boards come out every year, and each year I upgraded thinking a new shape would make me a better rider. finally, I stuck with the same board for several years and worked on fundamentals and finally began improving.
__________________
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2012, 04:30 PM
John510's Avatar
John510 John510 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 1,345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Only 450 HP? Use an LS3. It will be way cheaper.
__________________
68 Camaro "Bloodline". OZMO Twin DBW LS3 with TSP 231/236 cam, Speedtech frame, Ridetech coilovers, Chassisworks G Billet/Fab 9, Asanti 19's, Fesler brakes, Carbon Anvil everything, etc.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

65 Fastback "Maddo" @ Meanstreets Performance. Ridetech, crate 306/T5, tubbed, Forgeline
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2012, 06:01 PM
DETON8R's Avatar
DETON8R DETON8R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Interesting innovations, nothing really new though. Direct fuel injection into the combustion chamber, which looks to be the reason for the piston head re-design. Cylinder deactivation seems to have been figured out, so nice for the fuel economy, and the Variable Valve Timing helps adjust the Hp vs Torque ratios, and again helps fuel economy. All really cool stuff for automotive engineers and someone that likes to buy a new car and drive the crap out of it......... What about the folks that want to tinker and improve beyond just an engine swap and a GMPP Engine controller?

I didn't see GM tooting their horn that they have produced this new engine and the cost will be significantly less to produce and has extended longevity making its value to the customer substantially greater. Nor was some other breakthrough announced that would make me change my direction in my project build. Innovation is good, not sure I want to pay for innovation at the front end for what I want.

All these innovations are improving fuel economy, driveability and reliability. Awesome, great news from Detroit!! They are raising the bar again!! I'm not sure that these innovations will trickle down into the Hot Rod industry any time soon. The Gen III/IV engines were available for several years and a few people with very technical expertise and proficiency were able to use these for the first 5 to 8 years before they were ever really "retooled" and made available for the average person to install in their hot rods. The fact that there is a ready market for these Gen V engines and there already is a line of business at GM to market these engines to the hot rod community means that this might be available in 3 to 5 years and be competitive with current Gen III/IV options.

I'm not holding my breath, and I'm going to run an LS1. Sure I could open my wallet and get a better LS3, LS7 or an LSX, but why?? I will seldom use the engine to its full potential, and I will have the power, performance, weight savings and driveability of the Gen III engine, which isn't that much different than what the Gen V will offer. All I wanted was a modern handling car, with a modern engine and transmission wrapped in classic iron, and an ability to say I did that myself. For now the Gen V engine just puts a bigger price tag on the engine, and limits the options to modify the power plant. In the future, who knows what will be available and what that engine package will do, but for now it just looks like extra cost for minimal gains in power.
__________________
DETONATOR - 69 Camaro RS
LS1 - T56 - Chris Alston Frame - 2" drop
G-Link Rear - 4.20 gears in 9" - Mini Tubs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2012, 06:54 PM
XLexusTech XLexusTech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,342
Thanks: 90
Thanked 132 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Hopefully it will drive down LS prices... but No it wont change my plans to use one....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2012, 08:37 AM
andrew69_04 andrew69_04 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

LSx all the way
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-03-2012, 08:44 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

The leap from the LS to the LT1 is not even close in comparison from a Gen 1 small block to the LS. I'd venture to say that the LT1 will prove to be less reliable due to the high pressure pump. Anytime you add complexity, you decrease reliability.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net