...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-12-2010, 10:39 AM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default 2005 ctsv t56 swap

has any body out there used a t56 from ctsv for theyre swap. the t56 will be going in a 69 camaro. by what I can see I would have to eliminate shifter and out put (three prong).

1. will a standard t56 shifter fit

2. how do I change to yoke , do I have to change out put shaft or tail housing,

I have not even touched it yet but figure get as much info as possible before I do
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2010, 01:28 PM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

so I assume nobody has used this type t56 for theyre swap.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2010, 04:23 PM
SSMuscle SSMuscle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've been wondering this same thing since I have a 68 camaro that I'm swapping a 5.3 with a CTSV t56. Hopefully someone will chime in to answer both our questions
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2010, 01:35 AM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

well I tell you what if I cant change the 3 prong yoke, I could just build a drive shaft that could mate to trans.

now the problem with that is what do you for the rear? because as far as I know U joints create a vibration that is cancelled out with the opposing U joint,( thats why they place u joints 90 degrees from eachother with opposing angles. ) but if I dont have 1 on trans out put shaft im almost sure ill get vibration at around 75mph-90mph

now if I can find a yoke that will mate to a 9" rear end from a 2010 camaro or cts v. may work. chances are slim.

so I guess build a custom yoke to fit rear end or viseversa (trans )

some body out there has to make a driveshaft conversion where both ends are ctsv style joionts ( euro style ) and different type yokes --- splines 27 etc....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2010, 06:35 AM
CamaroAJ's Avatar
CamaroAJ CamaroAJ is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 884
Thanks: 104
Thanked 330 Times in 140 Posts
Default

if i remember i'll look under the girlfriends cts-v when i get home and look. also yes you would have to change the output shaft on that trans because its a bolt on flange.

the new camaro uses the same design and i had to replace a drive shaft, fuel tank, front and rear flanges and all the bolts and the exhaust system because the 3 bolts that hold it on failed. i would rather have u joints than a rubber cuppler. something to think about.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-22-2010, 10:58 AM
CamaroAJ's Avatar
CamaroAJ CamaroAJ is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 884
Thanks: 104
Thanked 330 Times in 140 Posts
Default

ok looking at the transmission i am going to say no. there is just too many things that would need to be changed to make it work. the shifter part is the main issue then the output shaft houseing and also the output shaft its self.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-22-2010, 04:32 PM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

too late to backdown I bought italready , I called a few places. I will have to change the tail housing and mainshaft might as well upgrade to the viper shaft. as far as the shifter I looked at it yesterday, it seems like a pretty straight forward shifter so i'm confident it can work.

thanks for taking the time to look under the goat.

whats the reason for GM to use those driveshafts, maybe they needed to reduce vibration (if it was one piece ), but they are two piece front side being shorter than rear?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-22-2010, 04:33 PM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

cts v (not goat) sorry

Last edited by frankv11; 01-14-2011 at 05:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-22-2010, 09:23 PM
Zimm1000 Zimm1000 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default What Happened

I have a 56 chevy and just purchased a cts-v TR 6060 out of a 2004. I obviously ran into the same issues as you, which led me here. Just curious to know how this turned out for your project and if it was worth the cost, or if I should just sell the tranny, and get a more conventional one. Thanks, Zimm
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-23-2010, 04:54 PM
PhillipM PhillipM is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimm1000 View Post
I have a 56 chevy and just purchased a cts-v TR 6060 out of a 2004. I obviously ran into the same issues as you, which led me here. Just curious to know how this turned out for your project and if it was worth the cost, or if I should just sell the tranny, and get a more conventional one. Thanks, Zimm
Hate to break it to you... The T56 in the 2004 CTSV was NOT a TR6060. It was a standard T56. Just don't want you to think you have something you don't.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net