...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2005, 09:26 PM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dexter, MN
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Disc Brakes - need a proofreader before I publish this

This goes out in the Northstar Chevelle Club newsletter tomorrow, It's late, and my head is spinning... I need a proofreader to check my accuracy. Thanks
What's STOPPING You? - Disc Brake Tech

The options are nearly endless for adapting disc brakes to the front of your Chevelle or El Camino. Much consideration must be given to your budget, your intentions for how you’ll use the car, and of course your safety when dealing with your brakes. Most of our Chevelles would have came from the factory with drum brakes, with the exception of some ‘67-72s that had optional discs and all ‘69-72 SS cars, which came standard with discs. Many of them have been converted, either using original parts, kits, or some of the other popular swaps. Each option has advantages and disadvantages. Hopefully this information will help you decide which setup is right for your car. The most important part of this is choosing your spindles.

Stock Disc Spindles: GM was good at making things interchangeable, and the front spindles were no exception. There are several cars you can look for when searching for these spindles, and they are a direct swap onto any ’64-72 Chevelle. You can find them on 67-72 GM A-bodies (Chevelle, Monte Carlo, El Camino, Skylark, GS, LeMans, GTO, Cutlass, 442). They were also used on GM’s 67-69 F-body (Camaro, Firebird) and ‘68-74 X-body (Nova, Omega, Ventura, Apollo). 1967 was the first year for the factory disc brakes, and along with the ‘68s, they used the very rare four-piston calipers. These are very expensive to rebuild, and are worth much more to someone looking for “correct” 67-68 discs than to anyone just looking to stop well. For this reason, it is recommended to use the ‘69 and later single-piston calipers. The 11” discs are sufficient for stopping your Chevelle for ordinary type driving, but they will get hot and fade quickly if you do any road-course racing.

Stock Drum Spindles: These are good for more than just scrap iron, so don’t throw them out just yet. With a little machining, you can bolt the stock disc caliper brackets on them, and “convert” them to disc spindles for about $80 if you can do the machine-work yourself. The drum spindles are also very popular for modifying to fit 12” C4 and 13” C5 Corvette brakes. There is some minor machining to be done on the upper bolt boss, custom caliper brackets need to be fabricated, and the Corvette rotors slip on over the drum brake hubs. Access to a machine-shop is helpful, but there have been many “do-it-yourself’ers” who have made their own brackets using 5/16” thick flat steel.

S-10 and G-body Spindles: The brakes from 2-wheel-drive S-10s and S-15s and the G-bodies (Monte Carlo, Malibu, Regal, etc.) of the 80s are somewhat popular for converting drum brake Chevelles to discs. They are basically a direct swap, except for the lower ball-joint, which requires machining to fit the Chevelle lower A-arms. This swap is not recommended for heavy street-use, because the rotors are only 10” diameter. This is not sufficient to safely stop your heavy Chevelle in traffic. The drag racers like this swap, because the small rotors are light, and reduce rotating mass. Drag racing doesn’t require heavy braking, so this is fine for this purpose. The conversion is simple, as you simply use the ball-joints, calipers, rotors, and tie-rod ends for the donor-car.

“Tall” Spindles: This topic always creates controversy. Some guys love them, and others equate them to the anti-christ. There are positives and negatives, but overall it’s an affordable mild performance upgrade, with parts that are easy to find. The praises of this spindle come from the option of using 12” rotors, and it’s height, which changes the geometry favorably by increasing negative camber gains in compression, giving the tires more bite to the pavement. The stock Chevelle spindles are 2” shorter, and actually create positive camber in compression, causing only the outer edge of the tire bite the pavement. The negative effects from this spindle are spawned entirely from the steering arm location, which creates bump-steer issues much worse than the stock spindles. The length of the steering arm will also make your turning radius wider, and slow your turning ratio. These spindles will lower your car about 3/4” from stock, and widen your track-width, so larger backspacing wheels may be needed for fender clearance. Aftermarket upper control arms, or offset cross-shafts will be necessary for a proper alignment. The offset shafts are much cheaper, but some people have clearance issues with them, especially on big-block ‘64-67 Chevelles with headers.

The choices for donors of “tall” spindles is determined by what size brakes you want, 11” or 12”. The ‘73-77 Chevelles have a tall spindle that uses an 11” brake with a 4-3/4” bolt circle. ‘77-’90 Caprice (civilian) sedans also had 11” rotors and 4-3/4” bolt circle, however the ‘77-90 Caprice police-package cars and station wagons, and all ‘91-96 caprices used 12” rotors and a 5” bolt circle. To adapt to a 4-3/4” bolt-circle, you can use the 1LE police package ‘89 Camaro rotors. The ‘77 model year spindles will not work because the outer bearing was smaller, and will not fit with the 1LE rotors, and the late-95 and all 96 spindles have a 5/8” lower ball-joint rather than a 9/16”, so for this swap it is recommended that you use ‘78-94 Caprice 12” brake spindles. If you are doing this swap, it’s worth the extra money to upgrade to the 12” rotors because their larger size allows them to absorb more heat, the increased surface area helps to dissipate the heat more quickly, and the extra leverage allows more stopping power with less effort. The 12” B-body brakes are the largest brakes that will fit inside a 15” wheel. To adapt the B-body spindles, you use the B-body calipers, bearings, and ball-joints, G-body tie-rod ends, and the Camaro 1LE rotors. The lower ball joints need to be machined to fit the chevelle arms. The wheel studs are metric, so metric lug-nuts, or changing the studs will be necessary.

Aftermarket Spindles: There are several companies selling replacement OEM style spindles, and 2” drop spindles. There are also a few companies with better options in the works. Fatman Fabrications (www.fatmanfab.com) is working on a 2” drop “Tall” spindle that uses the stock Chevelle steering arms, so you get the advantages of both the stock steering geometry, and the improved camber-curve of the tall-spindles. ATS (www.t56kit.com) is making an aluminum spindle that uses C5 corvette hubs, with optimized geometry similar to the Fatman spindles. Both of these new spindles are currently in the engineering and testing phase, and have not been released for sale at this time.

Tall Ball-Joints: While using your short OEM spindles, adding Howe Precision “tall” ball-joints from Savitske Classic & Custom (www.scandc.com) , will effectively add height to the spindle. You can run tall uppers for slight improvements, or tall upper and lowers for more dramatic improvements. You will achieve all the benefits of the tall spindles with none of the drawbacks, and your options for adapting larger Corvette brakes still apply. When using the lower tall ball joints, you will lower your car 3/4” and decrease bumpsteer.

I’m no brake expert, but most of this information was researched on the “Brakes & Suspension” forum on Team Chevelle (www.chevelles.com/forums/ ), while I changed my plan daily, and had to keep researching new options. I have decided to use OEM spindles, with stock 11” brakes, until I my budget allows for 17” wheels to clear the C5 13” Corvette brakes I really want.

-by Derek Kiefer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2005, 10:45 PM
907rs's Avatar
907rs 907rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Anchorage
Posts: 2,693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Sounds good, Derek. You may want to capitalize the "C" in Chevelle. Sixth paragraph, second to the last sentence.
__________________
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2005, 11:01 PM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dexter, MN
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2005, 05:10 AM
astroracer astroracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Something I saw...
"outer edge of the tire to bite the pavement."
Tall Spindles topic-middle of the paragraph.
Nice job, very informative.
__________________
"Bad Ast" Astro Van Pro-Touring Project.... Heat, beat, file to fit, paint to match...

Last edited by astroracer; 09-29-2005 at 05:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:30 PM
chicane's Avatar
chicane chicane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
ATS (www.t56kit.com) is making an aluminum spindle that uses C5 corvette hubs, with optimized geometry similar to the Fatman spindles.
Everyone already pointed out the only grammatical errors I could find.

All except for the above statement, is written very well. There is nothing even close to being similar when comparing these.

Somethings you can hold a candle to.....and some you can not. If you are going to make a statement, at least make a correct one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2005, 12:10 AM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dexter, MN
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicane
Somethings you can hold a candle to.....and some you can not. If you are going to make a statement, at least make a correct one.
It has already been sent out, and I apologize for generalizing maybe a little too much, but I tried to keep it very simple and easy for the "novice" to follow along. I haven't done a lot of research on the ATS "AFX" spindle, but to my knowledge, it is at least similar in that it has the benefits which I explained, without the drawbacks which I also explained. Maybe "similar" wasn't the right word, but you did get a free plug to 50+ chevelle owners in MN.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2005, 10:01 AM
Marcus SC&C's Avatar
Marcus SC&C Marcus SC&C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Nice job Derek! The only things I would have mentioned are that the G spindle swap like the B swap also slows the steering (and affects the ackerman) on an A body and it requires the same custom (or modular) lower ball joints as the B swap. No biggie hardly anyone does that swap anyway. Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2005, 02:49 PM
USAZR1's Avatar
USAZR1 USAZR1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 273
Thanks: 20
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicane
All except for the above statement, is written very well. There is nothing even close to being similar when comparing these.
Somethings you can hold a candle to.....and some you can not. If you are going to make a statement, at least make a correct one.
Do you know the geometry specs of the Fatman spindles? If not,how can you say your stuff is worlds better?
Just because you guarantee something doesn't make it so. We're supposed to take your word for it,right?
__________________
Clint Hooper
Clint's 70 El Camino restomod Sold
Clint's 69 Elky Protourer Sold
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2005, 05:25 PM
Teetoe_Jones Teetoe_Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: La La Land, CA
Posts: 856
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Clint-
yeah, we know the geometry on that spindle, but only for the F body cars. The A body cars is still under development, but we have spoken with Marcus (The most knowledgeable in this situation) to do some R&D with our new AFX spindle and taller ball joint swap. I don't think Derek was out of line at all since at this point in the game, the actual effects of our spindle vs Fatmans is all just hard numbers. We've ran them, but we haven't physically put them up to the test as of yet.

Derek-
Looks like a well written article, and I thank you for mentioning our new spindle as an option.

Tyler
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net