...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-23-2015, 06:59 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71RS/SS396 View Post
It does make a difference having a thermostat on the oil. I have the same radiator/cooler set-up as the op and initially had no t-stat but struggled to build oil temps in cool weather while street driving.

I'm not sure I would use what factory engineers do as a model for proper cooling for road course duty. There are very few factory built cars that could handle a 30 minute session on a big road course where the duty cycle is higher than anything it will see in street duty.
Very few pro-touring cars can run 30 minutes all out as well...

The stat sure isn't going to hurt. I just never had any problems with moisture in 7,000 miles. I was a fair weather driver and always ran a detergent oil vs. race oil. I ran dual -12 breathers which likely helped evacuate and many of my miles were combo street/city. Down the freeway in sub 60 weather would definitely make for low oil temps. What's another $200 bucks. ha
__________________
Todd

Last edited by Vegas69; 02-23-2015 at 07:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-23-2015, 07:42 AM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

The C&R cooler will be fine, that's what I'm using and it cools mine just fine. I would use the 180.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-23-2015, 08:15 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlwdvm View Post
I was superised to hear that some think that the C&R oil cooler won't be enough for a 20 minute track session...which is what I will be doing most of the time. I went a little overboard with my cooling system for piece of mind and room to grow in the future. I thought Steilow was using a similar setup in some of his builds. I think for a little added cost with the Improved Racing options, I will go with a thermostat. Would 212 be a better bet if the car will see a little street time, or would 180 be better for the track? I'm still trying to find a spin-on oil filter adapter that I can plumb my accusump into as well. The factory style oil pan doesn't leave much room for the spin-on adapters! Thanks.


Did you check Accusump.com They offer various spin on parts and adaptors on their website.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-24-2015, 05:08 AM
jlwdvm jlwdvm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 350
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Default

The single inlet adapter that accusump has for the 22mmx1.5 has a kick out where the inlet is machined in that won't allow it to spin on the Holley 302 LS pan...or any other LS pan I think. I found one that Moroso makes that may fit. It has a lower profile at the inlet. It, along with more fittings, should be here in a few days.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net