...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 12-30-2013, 03:56 PM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Are all of you guys asking about EFI options using this on SBC/BBC? Or are some of you using it on LS applications?

So far everyone has told me to just go LS.
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-30-2013, 05:01 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redefined View Post
Are all of you guys asking about EFI options using this on SBC/BBC? Or are some of you using it on LS applications?

So far everyone has told me to just go LS.

I can't speak for Bryan or Don, but I was asking in general about the EFI units themselves. You sound like you're deciding between SBC or LS, but going EFI either way.

The current street & track engine package I plan to use & offer for sale is a carbureted 410" SBC that makes 600#/730 hp.

Later in 2014 I'm developing some killer 850+ HP Normally Aspirated LS engines. I wanted to see how the FAST 2.0 is working out ... and if the complaints I hear are factual ... and if so, then what are the better EFI systems.

From what Mark shared with us, it sounds like the FAST 2.0 system is not as tailorable, and therefore doesn't offer the improved street drive-ability that is the key reason for going EFI in the first place.

We can build the same power numbers with a carb. But a carb is impossible to get optimized at each level of the rpm range. The EFI systems are capable of optimizing the fule & spark curve ... and therefore improve the lower rpm drive-ability of any engine. But it sounds like ... at this point of product development ... that some brands do this better & some not so good.

Have you decided SBC or LS yet ?



__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12-30-2013, 05:15 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redefined View Post
So far everyone has told me to just go LS.
If your goal is to build 700hp with a supercharger, you can do that pretty easy with a SBC or LS. If you have a SBC that is capable of living & thriving with 700 hp, then that will be a less expensive route.

If you're building from scratch, with a 700 hp goal for each, If you did everything the same, the LS will cost a bit more. The larger additional costs you'll run into is if you're doing a change over & need to change everything in the car.

On a side note ...
700 hp with a blower is an interesting territory for most production engines. You can make factory parts work, but the life is shortened. How much depends on many specifics.

For example, you can use an LS1-7 aluminum block, but they weren't designed for that kind of power & heat, and eventually you'll have issues. But an LSA or LS9 block would work well long term. The same concept applies to cranks, rods, pistons, etc, even more so.


__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology

Last edited by Ron Sutton; 12-31-2013 at 07:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-30-2013, 05:15 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 17
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I've used a FAST system on an SBC and a Holley HP EFI system on an LS motor. I definitely like the Holley system better, but I'm not an expert at tuning for certain. It was very easy to setup and get running smoothly, and I like the graphing / logging capabilities of the unit as well.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12-30-2013, 05:16 PM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Better stuff out there.

As mentioned, download the software then look for available tables that will enhance drivability from cold start to hot running.
__________________
Mark
Engine builder and tuner.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 12-30-2013, 06:15 PM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ron, my current SBC motor/tranny build is in the first post. I believe the compression is around 10:1 so not sure it'd do very well boosted. I did not build the motor myself but that's what I was told. That and I don't really have anything against carbs, I just want the reliability and consistency that seems to come with fuel injection. This is the first car/motor I've ever owned that's carbed. I need to start with having it tuned correctly, both the carb and the motor.

Have I decided LS or SBC? I'd really like to do LS, but again I have nothing against SBC. Have I decided 100% fuel injection? I suppose the answer is no. I have a friend that runs a carbed LS motor in his Panoz race car and that seems to run like a scolded monkey and cranks after 2 pumps of the gas EVERY time, mine doesn't even do that.

Like I said previously also, 700hp isn't a must have. I'm not chasing a whp, a 1/4 time or anything like that. Someone had ask me a goal so that's what I threw out. More of a goal is reliability for the street, road course, autocross, than power numbers. I'd rather have 550whp and have it turn over 100% of the time I turn the key. I'd also rather not smell like exhaust/fuel every time I drive it haha!
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**

Last edited by redefined; 12-30-2013 at 06:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-30-2013, 07:23 PM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

For what it's worth, originally I just wanted to do a Procharged intercooled setup on the current SBC and stay carbd. Not sure how good that'd be with the current SBC build.
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-30-2013, 07:41 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,556
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 830 Times in 627 Posts
Default

Keeping boost at 5-6 psi and tuned properly, the Pro-charged setup will do fine with that compression ratio. That's basically the set up that Pro-Charger sells as kits for factory LT1 and LS vehicles. Now is your cam compatible with boost? That would be something to investigate.

Deadnuts reliable and cheap but make good power? Get a Gen3 6.0. Stroke it to 402 cubic inches with a 4 inch crank. Put stock or ported L92/LS3 heads on it with a cam that will produce broad power but not be radical. You should be upper 400s to 500 at the wheels with a great and very fun to drive torque band. Hell, save money and stay with Gen 3 heads. It's not like ported LS6 heads are crappy or don't make power. I'm fairly certain this is the route I'll take.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

Last edited by WSSix; 12-30-2013 at 08:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:13 PM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix View Post
Keeping boost at 5-6 psi and tuned properly, the Pro-charged setup will do fine with that compression ratio. That's basically the set up that Pro-Charger sells as kits for factory LT1 and LS vehicles. Now is your cam compatible with boost? That would be something to investigate.

Deadnuts reliable and cheap but make good power? Get a Gen3 6.0. Stroke it to 402 cubic inches with a 4 inch crank. Put stock or ported L92/LS3 heads on it with a cam that will produce broad power but not be radical. You should be upper 400s to 500 at the wheels with a great and very fun to drive torque band. Hell, save money and stay with Gen 3 heads. It's not like ported LS6 heads are crappy or don't make power. I'm fairly certain this is the route I'll take.
Right but what kinda power with 5-6psi? At that level of boost is it really worth it? Not worried about the cam, if it's not good I don't mind swapping out cams but is it good for it? Probably not but not sure.

Also what would the best way to simply change the compression on my motor? BMW guys use different headgaskets, granted the headgasket is a weak spot in those motors but they use them to lower the compression on a stock motor. HG, pistons? And change cam?
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**

Last edited by redefined; 12-30-2013 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:22 PM
uxojerry uxojerry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If your at 10:1 with a forged bottom end you could probably get what you want with a thicker head gasket, blower cam swap, and a blow thru carb. I am about convinced to do this on my next scratch build because it is so simple and effective. The blow thru uses the fuel for lowering iat's and most are not using an intercooler. This type of build is an art so you would need to find an experienced guy to help with the mods. 700hp maybe with race gas or E85, 600hp with 92. You would have a daily drive pulley and a smaller pulley for E85/race gas.

Super chevy modded a BBC 502 and got 1073hp with the whole build costing $13k from scratch. My guess is your 700hp could be done for less than $5k.

Name:  th_D1SCrunning.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  15.6 KB

The general consensus is your block is the weakest link but will live long at 600hp. An occasional run of 700hp shouldnt hurt it. Consensus is the vortech units run cooler, which might be important with no intercooler.

Steve Morris Racing Engines - D1SC kit $3.5k, Blow Thru $1k-, cam swap, gasket change, head studs, $1k-. Add in a good tune and your at $5k.

Last edited by uxojerry; 12-31-2013 at 12:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net