...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 01-06-2013, 11:39 AM
broken1234 broken1234 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 51
Default TR6060 vs. T56 Magnum

Buying a tranny for a street driven 2nd gen Camaro (LS with twin turbos)with around 750 rwhp.... don't plan much track (drag and autocross) usage, but it will get a little. I assumed I would end up with a T56 of some variety but a couple of suppliers are trying to sell me a TR6060. Everybody that I talk to has a different opinion about why I need one of the other. I'm leaning toward a beefed up T56 Magnum just because it seems that most folks go that way with no issues... what's the collective wisdom of the group here??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 01-06-2013, 11:56 AM
wiedemab's Avatar
wiedemab wiedemab is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Batesville, IN
Posts: 1,148
Default

The T56 Magnum is essential a particular configuration of the TR6060 -- soooooooo......
__________________
__________________
Brandon Wiedeman
'72 Suburban
'67 Chevy II -
http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=46846

I have about 3 lifetimes worth of projects planned out in my head!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 01-06-2013, 12:11 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,262
Default

6060 is rated to 600 ft. lbs. vs. the T56 Mag's 700 ft. lbs. Being that the 6060 is OEM spec they have most likely cut some cost corners to meet OEM contract demands.

Upside to OEM is parts availability may be better. The T56 Mag parts availability is suspect from my experience. The vent line I needed was in Mexico and no where else.

Gear ratio's could be a deciding factor. I didn't see ratio specs on Tremec's website. I'm sold on close ratio compact spacing vs. wide ratio low 1st and tall 6th. The wide ratio doesn't make sense, if you're running a tall rear gear that needs a low 1st, you don't need a tall 6th. If you're running a low rear gear that needs a tall 6th then you have a worthless 1st gear.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 01-06-2013, 10:03 PM
T_Raven's Avatar
T_Raven T_Raven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Idaho Falls, Id
Posts: 242
Default

The Magnum is the aftermarket version of the TR6060. As for gearing, as far as I know the only factory TR6060 with the closer gearing is in the non Z51 Vettes. Camaros, CTS-Vs, etc all have the wider gearing and are not set up for a normal drive shaft. I don't know about Ford and Dodge applications though.

You can essentially take a Vette TR6060, swap the input shaft, mid plate, main shaft, and tail housing to Magnum parts and have a Magnum.

If someone is trying to sell you a TR6060 and claiming it's not a Magnum what application is it for? With the bell housing and input shaft on a Camaro or CTS-V TR6060, they will bolt up to any LS engine but you have to use the LS3 style clutch. With a Magnum you can use any t56 bell housing and clutch.
__________________
67 Firebird http://www.pro-touring.com/forum/showthread.php?t=52460
69 Firebird http://www.pro-touring.com/showthrea...t56&highlight=
68 Firebird, 79 TA, 89 GTA, 01 WS6, 69 Tempest
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 01-16-2013, 03:04 PM
gnx7's Avatar
gnx7 gnx7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 243
Default

The Magnum is a waaaay better transmission than the older '93-02 style Fbody T56. Shifts better due to triple synchros, wider faces on the gears made of stronger metal, all the bearings are bigger for higher load capacity, 31 spline output shaft, provision to tap an oil cooler/sprayer, the case weighs more for increased rigidity.

I sold a fully built old style T56 in my RX-7 swap to put in a new Magnum. Such a better transmission especially the shifting. Plus the .80 5th gear ratio keeps you more in the your powerband.
__________________
Project: 1969 Chevelle, alum 5.3, GTS76 turbo, Chiseled Perf A/W intercooler, Holley HP EFI, T56 Magnum, McLeod twin disc, 9" 35spline 3.25 gear rear, TRZ goodies, Wilwood big brakes. CTS-V Recaro seats!
Parts collection mode! 800rwhp+/20mpg+/9's@150mph goal

1993 Mazda FD RX-7, built LS7, T56 Magnum, Holley HP, Davis Tech TC, 8.8" 3.73 Cobra IRS diff, DSS axles, Ohlins coilovers, big brakes.
CCW 18x11 front 315/30/18's and 18x12.5 rear on 335/30/18 RA1's, with full interior, a/c and p/s 2850lbs/575rwhp
10.31@137mph 165mph Shift-Sector 1/2 mile speed
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 01-16-2013, 06:54 PM
Reactor Reactor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Default

Check out Rockland Standard Gear. You can get a new magnum T56 with the ZR1 corvette close ratio gear set. It has a 2.29 first gear and works great with a 4.10 rear. Not cheap, but you get what you pay for. Reactor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 02-19-2013, 10:48 AM
broken1234 broken1234 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 51
Default

Anybody have any experience with RPM Transmissions in Indiana or Bowler in Illinois? I think I have it nailed down to one of these two...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 02-19-2013, 11:42 AM
Ron in SoCal's Avatar
Ron in SoCal Ron in SoCal is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,273
Default

Rodney/Jeremy @ RPM are great guys and I know many that have had nothing but great transactions with them. They're racers too.

People love Mark Bowler and he's a big supporter of our hobby. My only experience with him was a messed up special order part on their side. By the time I discovered it, it was too late to return so I had to eat it. No 'sorry Ron', nothing.

Tough choice...
__________________
Ron in SoCal
69 Camaro in progress
http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=31246

Are you ready for some football?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 02-19-2013, 10:18 PM
broken1234 broken1234 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 51
Default

well, I have decided that I want a beefed up tranny, and these two outfits are the final two. I like what I hear about the 6060, but here's my silly hang-up. If the 6060 is the way to go, then why don't I read about more 6060 usage on here?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 02-19-2013, 10:55 PM
takid455 takid455 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 192
Default

most refer to it as T56 vs particular series of T56. I run T56's that are built up from stock and there no going back. The 6060 is a great unit. It weighs a little more than an earlier T56 as the internals are heavier (read stronger) Unless you opt for 9310 gear sets which unless you have deep 4 figure power numbers, its is doubtful that you will break it. The triple snycros may shifting smoother than the T56. Some T56's had triple CF snycros too like later Z06's and C5R vettes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Lateral-g.net