PDA

View Full Version : Toyota buyout of GM...more bad news


69MyWay
04-01-2006, 03:05 AM
Off the wire.


Japan's biggest company embarked this week on what experts say is the biggest stock transfer action in American-Japanese financial history. Due to massive losses and an unprecedented decline in market share, General Motors is officially on the chopping block. Shareholders in Toyota voted by an overwhelming majority Friday (March 31) to approve the company's proposed merger with General Motors, whose shareholders likewise gave almost unanimous support to the deal the same day. The next step in carrying through the merger, Toyota officials announced Monday (March 27), will be to persuade shareholders to exchange their Toyota stock for new Toyota-GM shares.

The more who do so, the better for everyone. At least three-quarters of Toyota shareholders have to participate voluntarily in the trade-in for the merger to proceed according to the terms of the deal, a provision made with an eye to the potential tax burden on GM's shareholders. If, as Toyota officials hope, 90 percent or more of its shareholders participate, the merger would qualify as a pooling of interestsť under U.S. accounting regulations, which would allow the new corporation to avoid taking a charge against future earnings for the premium Toyota is paying above the value of GM's assets. With a target of 90 percent-plus in sight, Toyota outlined plans Monday for a month-long campaign to spur shareholders to action.

Hitting that target certainly looks to be possible, going by shareholder support for the merger. In Friday's vote, the owners of 99.89 percent of Toyota's stock backed the merger. GM's stockholders gave their assent with a hardly less compelling 97.5 percent pro-merger vote. If the merger goes ahead as planned, GM's shareholders will receive .6235 shares of Toyota-General Motors stock for each share of GM they now hold. In all, they will own approximately 42 percent of the new company. Toyota's shareholders will receive Toyota-General Motors shares at a rate of one-to-one, but they will receive a bonus of .005 of a share per share - an extra share for every 200 they currently own - if the 90-percent trade-in goal is met.

Together, Toyota and General Motors expect to produce a total of 4.4 million vehicles this year and to take in DM 260 billion in revenues. The new company, which will have its headquarters in Osaka, Japan and an administrative seat outside Detroit, will be the world's largest auto-maker, trailing only Ford in output (global sales). The combined Toyota-General Motors work force will number approximately 428,000, and all employees, Toyota and General Motors officials have been insisting, can expect to hold on to their jobs with the exception of the largest lay-off, job buyout in history offered by General Motors in late March. The goal of the merger, they say, is to reap savings by cooperation in developing new products and new technologies, not by slashing payrolls.

This merger will have an immediate impact on product line offerings. Toyota announced the Monte Carlo, Grand Prix, and Corvette will be phased out of production over the next three years due to excessive build cost and slow sales during a period of record fuel costs. A new super car based on the Supra will replace the long standing Corvette as a blend of ultra high fuel efficiency and power. Other model lines are slated for replacement or termination through 2010.

Toyota will retain the current General Motors dealer networks until new contracts are offered in 2009. It is rumored this is sure to kill any return of the famed Camaro nameplate in the near future.


Return to Econ & Bus Geog

ProTouring442
04-01-2006, 04:13 AM
Yes, yes... Happy April Fools Day!

Shiny Side Up!
Bill
'72 442 "Inamorata"

black2002ls
04-01-2006, 07:05 AM
Please tell me that is April Fools??????

jonny51
04-01-2006, 02:08 PM
Deal's like this do not happen overnight,nice try :D

Travis Rankin
04-01-2006, 05:46 PM
"It's bound to happen either next year or the year after," Endo said of Toyota's outstripping General Motors. "But perhaps there isn't much point to the question. It doesn't make much sense to be comparing vehicle production numbers between the world's most profitable automaker and one that's on the verge of collapse." :beathorse :lol:

sr20sileighty
04-01-2006, 06:35 PM
blasted april fools...that had me a bit pissed about the corvette....oh well..lol

Good one

Gray

Diesel77
04-01-2006, 10:03 PM
okat now that wasnt funny, spit coffee all over

Kendall Burleson
04-02-2006, 12:23 AM
That was pretty cool tall tail I almost fell for it untill you said they wanted to kill the vett. :D

69MyWay
04-02-2006, 03:26 AM
:D April Fools!

The scary thing is that with all the bad news around the General lately, it isn't too hard to believe!

rockdogz
04-02-2006, 01:57 PM
Looked almost official until I saw the part about phasing out of Corvette... That would not happen... :lol:

JohnnyGMachine
04-03-2006, 10:33 AM
Holy Crap, I'm a Ford guy and even I was pissed about the Corvette going away!!! Good one!

John

69MyWay
06-30-2006, 05:36 PM
Hey guys...This time it isn't a joke.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201707,00.html

NEW YORK — Kirk Kerkorian, the billionaire mogul and major shareholder in General Motors Corp. (GM), said Friday that automakers Renault SA and Nissan Motor Co. are interested in purchasing a significant stake in GM and including the Detroit automaker in their alliance.

Kerkorian's investment company, Tracinda Corp., told GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner in a letter that Renault and Nissan are receptive to the idea of including General Motors in their partnership and purchasing "a significant minority interest" in the automaker.

Click here to visit FOXBusiness.com's Autos Center.

Shares of GM soared $2.45, or 8.9 percent, to close at $29.89 on the New York Stock Exchange.

Tracinda, which owns 9.9 percent of GM's common stock and is GM's third-largest shareholder, said the existing French-Japanese partnership has created "tremendous engineering, manufacturing and marketing synergies, resulting in substantial benefits and cost savings to both Renault and Nissan."

In a separate letter to Nissan Chairman Carlos Ghosn and Renault Chairman Louis Schweitzer, Tracinda said: "Tracinda believes that such a global alliance has the potential to materially strengthen the competitive positions of all three companies in the increasingly challenging worldwide automotive industry."

(Story continues below)

ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertise Here

Tracinda urged GM's board to form a committee to "immediately and fully explore this opportunity together with management," as it feels the alliance could help GM "realize substantial synergies and cost savings and thereby greatly benefit the company and enhance shareholder value."

GM, in a statement, said the Tracinda request "will be taken under advisement" by its board of directors. The automaker said it has not received any offers or proposals from Renault/Nissan about an alliance. GM said it would have no further comment.

A GM official confirmed reports that the GM board met on Friday. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, was not authorized to discuss the meeting.

Nissan said in a statement that Ghosn had been approached by Kerkorian and his top aide Jerome York and other Tracinda officials "to assess the merits of GM joining the Renault Nissan Alliance."

"At this point, it is necessary that GM Board and top management fully support this project in order to start the study of this opportunity after agreement of Renault and Nissan boards," Nissan said.

Nissan said its alliance with Renault was an "open partnership" and "under the right circumstances and with the appropriate partners, the Alliance could be expanded further."

Renault owns a 44.4 percent stake in Nissan, which in turn owns a 15 percent stake in Renault. Nissan was on the brink of bankruptcy when Ghosn was dispatched by Renault to lead the Japanese company in 1999. Brazilian-born Ghosn engineered a cost-cutting and morale-boosting campaign that revived the automaker.

GM has been engaged in an extensive turnaround plan in North America amid declining profit, high labor costs and growing competition from Asian automakers. The automaker announced plans last year to close 12 plants by 2008 and earlier this week announced that 35,000 hourly workers had agreed to retire early or accept a buyout offer.

Kerkorian has pressured GM to take aggressive steps to restore profitability and his top adviser, York, was elected to GM's board earlier this year.

"What we're seeing here is the realization of the offshore foreign OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and the domestic OEMs sensing that while competition is healthy globally, global alliances are also very healthy, too," said James McTevia, a Detroit-area restructuring consultant.

Some analysts said the overtures could represent the first steps in the most significant alliance or merger since Daimler-Benz acquired Chrysler Corp. in 1998.

JP Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel said in a note to investors that it offered the potential for positive developments in purchasing, product development and in the growing China market.

"If GM management were to agree to such a partnership, we would view this as a major potential long-term positive for GM shareholders," Patel wrote.

Auto analyst Robert Barry of Goldman Sachs & Co., however, said he saw "little logic" in an alliance, noting that Renault has recently embarked on its own restructuring plan and Nissan has made strides on its own in North America, seizing market share from the domestic Big Three.

"We do not see the upside for Nissan from collaborating with struggling GM, certainly not in a manner that would require taking a GM stake," Barry wrote.

Gerald Meyers, former chairman of American Motors Corp. who now teaches at the University of Michigan, said the potential equity interest was "an opening shot, a feeler" but a long way off from a merger along the lines of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler.

Meyers, whose former company had an unsuccessful merger with Renault in 1979, said the inquiry was "a worrisome thing for the GM management. I'm sure they don't need another voice in the boardroom."

"Carlos Ghosn has a reputation of being a very strong CEO," Meyers said. "I can't imagine him taking a back seat to Rick Wagoner."

DaimlerChrysler Chairman Dieter Zetsche, during a morning news conference on incentives and an advertising campaign, called the Tracinda letter speculation and said that sometimes, such news doesn't lead to a result.

fvike
07-06-2006, 03:08 PM
I think GM would profit from a partnership with Renault particulary. Renault is at the very top in car crash safty (they got most Euro-NCAP 5 star rated cars), which is a huge selling point when it comes to passenger cars. GM however doesn't have "any" passenger cars anybody wants to buy. Renault could help GM develop safe passenger cars, which is the financial backbone of an OEM. They won't survive selling SUVs and Corvettes.

From a preformance standpoint, Renault is the current Formula 1 champion, and they have been involved with F1 for a long time. Renault doesn't have any sports cars / preformance cars in their model lineup. GM could very well take on the preformance oriented side of the partnership, and make use of that F1 tech/experiense.
What Nissan can contribute with I don't know, beacuse all they got is S H I T. Except for the Skyline and 350Z, I'll give them that.

Damn True
07-06-2006, 08:56 PM
One thing Renault does have is a kick-a$$ line of really nice, fuel efficient turbo-diesel engine cars. I rented a Renault Megane` wagon while in Italy for my honeymoon earlier this year. About the same size as a Subaru Outback, it had more than enough power to run in the left lane on the autostrada, it accelerated well, got great mileage was quiet and the entire car was comfortable and just really darn nice. Id love to have a similar car.

If GM formed a partnership with Renault similar to that of Chrysler and Daimler Benz I'd think we'd see some really nice "regular" cars out of the deal.

Roadrage David
07-08-2006, 12:11 AM
being from europe i can say that renault is not mercedes!!! its no where near merc when it comes to quality disighn ecetera not to mention engine tech. every car they built with the ecseption of 1 are all underpowerd and not one single car they build is made for the higher sigmend .i cant see what this company,s culture can bring to help/upgrade GM , compeard to what merc did for mopar/crijsler its a miss match if you ask me , audi volkswagen would be a better marrige .ps they dont have the muscle......... forgive my spelling

trapin
07-10-2006, 06:30 AM
Whatever. :rolleyes:

This is not going to happen.

fasstasheck
07-10-2006, 01:57 PM
man... time to change my drawers... cus I just crapped my pants... in a bad way