...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2010, 02:26 PM
RBR's Avatar
RBR RBR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default gm flywheel # 14091599N

I was given this flywheel to use with my LQ9 motor. Can anyone help me to ID this flywheel? Can it be used with my motor?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2010, 03:50 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,544
Thanks: 298
Thanked 537 Times in 339 Posts
Default

I cross referenced the number on a couple of GM parts sites and nothing was found. I don't think it is a GM number. If it is a part for GM models it may be an aftermarket # and not a original GM #. But, GM has been known to change part numbers on parts that are still being used/produced.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2010, 05:21 PM
RBR's Avatar
RBR RBR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for looking for me I keep searching. What if the number of teeth and the bolt holes are the same as the flex plate? Is that a good sign it might work?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:24 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,544
Thanks: 298
Thanked 537 Times in 339 Posts
Default

Logically it sounds right. But, I think there are other variable in the equation that may not work in the long run. Such as, thickness of the flywheel, spacing of the flywheel, etc.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2010, 12:43 PM
RBR's Avatar
RBR RBR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 509Chevelle View Post
Logically it sounds right. But, I think there are other variable in the equation that may not work in the long run. Such as, thickness of the flywheel, spacing of the flywheel, etc.
I was really hoping someone would say "yep that will work"! thanks for the reply
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net