...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2006, 09:37 AM
67Fastback 67Fastback is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Dish or no dish...that is the question..

I stole these pictures from the bozewheels/danica patrick thread. I asked the same question in there, but thought it might merit its own thread.

I know its personal opinion, but how do you guys feel about offest on the rear wheels that results in the "dish" look? As I plan my rear-end, the type of wheel that I want (offset) is going to determine the length of my rear end - mainly to avoid spacers if I decide to go with the no-dish look.

What do you guys think? I've included a couple of pics. One of late model wheels on a 67 Mustang and 2 of Danicas car with and without dish.

Thanks
Jeff
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2006, 10:46 AM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

My vote is for as much DISH as you can go.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2006, 10:53 AM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,027
Thanks: 19
Thanked 61 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Dish. I've had both, prefer the deeper dish look.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2006, 11:20 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Dish, or at least no offset.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2006, 11:31 AM
TonyL's Avatar
TonyL TonyL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 85
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Dished just implys hard core performance. It's always struck a chord with me.
Which is why a testarossa always looked "weak" to me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2006, 12:02 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,910
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Dish....

...And I'm not nuts about the look of front wheels with very little dish (a lot of positive offset) as is normally required when running the C5 stuff up front.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2006, 12:07 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 916
Thanks: 0
Thanked 87 Times in 34 Posts
Default

While I like the look of dished wheels, my practicality and engineering viewpoint takes priority. Think structural reasons.... have the spokes centered in the hoop. And up front for geometry reasons (scrub radius) you usually have hardly any dish at all with a well designed front suspension.

Function over looks IMO, although sometimes it's hard to give up the looks for better function.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 08-31-2006 at 01:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2006, 12:09 PM
jy211's Avatar
jy211 jy211 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Miami Florida
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Lips on the rims...you want them as large as you can...sorta like a woman's...think Angelina Jolie...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2006, 12:18 PM
Steve Chryssos's Avatar
Steve Chryssos Steve Chryssos is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,892
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I like both styles. And like blown353, I feel that too much dish is a detriment. It also says "old school".
__________________
________________
Steve Chryssos


Ridetech.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2006, 12:32 PM
Ricochet's Avatar
Ricochet Ricochet is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 2,384
Thanks: 265
Thanked 307 Times in 103 Posts
Default

IMO I like the dish look. As with everything though within reason. The look of a 10" wheel doesn't look good with 8" of backspace (negative offset) as does a 10" wheel with 3" of positve offset. From the functional standpoint, I understand the wider the track the better handling. But you asked about what looks better in which you will get opinions all across the board.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net