...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2006, 06:19 PM
Wilkinshc Wilkinshc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Single Turbo question?

What are the pros and cons to running a single turbo off one side of exhaust? Is it not possible? I am wondering about running a single turbo off one header because of space available, I want to run 6-8 lbs of boost on a 454 BBC. Any thoughts?

Thanks
Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2006, 06:56 PM
cutlasskid cutlasskid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i think you would have to run an exhaust crossover other than that you would be ok
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2006, 07:38 PM
Wilkinshc Wilkinshc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reply but I was was wondering if it would work without the crossover pipe. I have very limited space (65 corvette).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2006, 12:21 AM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 12,585
Thanks: 4,300
Thanked 1,456 Times in 630 Posts
Default

Although not optimal I saw a 289 make about 600 rwhp with the turbo running off just one side and the other going to a muffler and tailpipe. I didn't think each side of the engine would even have the same a/f, but it worked very well.


Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2006, 09:24 AM
Wilkinshc Wilkinshc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

camcojb,

Thanks for the info. I am wondering why you think the a/f ratio would be different? Is it because of back pressure on exhaust? Intake would have same boost.

I was wondering if half the exhaust could spin a big enough turbo without alot of turbo lag?

I appreciate help.

Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-2006, 10:26 AM
orange88 orange88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st. paul
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

why not just do two smaller turbos?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-2006, 11:45 AM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 12,585
Thanks: 4,300
Thanked 1,456 Times in 630 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilkinshc
camcojb,

Thanks for the info. I am wondering why you think the a/f ratio would be different? Is it because of back pressure on exhaust? Intake would have same boost.

I was wondering if half the exhaust could spin a big enough turbo without alot of turbo lag?

I appreciate help.

Chuck
I would think the exhaust pressure differences would do something to it, but if it does it's minor as he's been running it for quite a while this way.

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-2006, 01:40 PM
Wilkinshc Wilkinshc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orange88
why not just do two smaller turbos?
Orange88,

If you ever look at the engine bay of a 65 corvette with a big block, you would see why. I know it's possible but would take major changes. I still want to keep the A/C, and need a good size radiator to keep things cool. With one turbo it would make it alot more simple.

Jody,

thanks for the additional info. You have a very nice website, love the camaro project!

Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2006, 07:11 PM
orange88 orange88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st. paul
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

ive seen some very compact twin turbo setups. i think if you did a log syyle header and mounted them at the back of the motor that might fit.
i wouldent do a turbo off one side it would have tuning problems
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-08-2006, 01:09 AM
hotwheels's Avatar
hotwheels hotwheels is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Big Wyoming
Posts: 617
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Twin's verses a single set up just become a matter of preference and what you are willing to spend on a build.........for the gentlemen's question here, i would highly recommend a single turbo set up with a big block.....I would look at a turbo in the range of 62-1 in a p trim.....I would also recommend having a cross over tube coming from the header that doesn't have the turbo, feeding the turbo along with the main turbo header. This should help ensure equal pressure through out your entire system.........

I love my twin turbo'd car very much and my new engine is almost complete. If i ever do another turbo'd car, i am going to go with a single kit my self. It has been alot of work to maintain and keep both turbo's functioning together (mainly wastegate issue's)......


hotwheels of insanemustangs.com
__________________
1992 mustang gt twinturbo'd
1988 mustang gt bottlefed
2004 mach 1 resting in garage
1989 mustang coupe 4 cyl.
1980 mustang coupe 4 cyl.
MY MUSTANG ENTHUSIASTS SITE
Insanemustangs
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net