...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > LSX Conversions
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2014, 06:43 PM
blacktop blacktop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Holley pan 302-2

I swapping my 70 Chevelle over to a lq9 6.0 I have a 302-1 Holley pan new that was going to use on my 56 210 but sold it. What I've been reading is the inner tie rod hits the pan. Should I go with the new 302-2 pan if that does clear or is there a way to use the old pan and raise motor some without messing up drive Line angles? I have not purchased any mounts yet. Thanks for any help or suggestion. I was planning on using BRP mounts- I live 15 minutes from them so it's nice to just go there to get what I need.

Last edited by blacktop; 04-22-2014 at 06:54 PM. Reason: Change
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2014, 08:23 PM
kwhizz's Avatar
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kenosha , wi
Posts: 1,095
Thanks: 641
Thanked 411 Times in 158 Posts
Default

The 302-2 pan will give you some additional clearance as it doesn't sit as low.....but check on Holley's website as there are some other concerns with the pan


Ken
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2014, 08:43 PM
blacktop blacktop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwhizz View Post
The 302-2 pan will give you some additional clearance as it doesn't sit as low.....but check on Holley's website as there are some other concerns with the pan


Ken
Concerns on the older pan?? I like the 66 you built did you use the old Holley pan? Did you raise your motor up because of tie rod issue?

Last edited by blacktop; 04-25-2014 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Add
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2014, 10:19 AM
kwhizz's Avatar
kwhizz kwhizz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kenosha , wi
Posts: 1,095
Thanks: 641
Thanked 411 Times in 158 Posts
Default

I used a -1 pan in the Chevelle......the engine is raised slightly......and there is very slight contact at full travel.....but....It's not enough for any concern......I ordered a -2 pan (they were back ordered at the time) and it came in after I already had the engine back in......after reading about it as I remember there were some windage tray issues so I was uncomfortable swapping it out in the car........so....I left the -1 in.........

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-14-2014, 09:47 PM
n77nxc's Avatar
n77nxc n77nxc is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I just finished installing the 302-2 on my LQ9. The -2 requires a F-body Windage tray with a slight modification to a corner, in order for the oil pickup to fit properly. The modification is very simple. I wouldn't let the slight mod sway you from the 302-2.

__________________
1967 Camaro - Project "Resale Red" - Sold to 175RGR
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net